Advanced Cabinets Corp et al v. McAleenan et al
| Advanced Cabinets Corp and Ewelina Filipek |
| Kenneth Cuccinelli and Kevin McAleenan |
| 1:2019cv05930 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The status hearing set for 12/5/19 is reset to 12/11/19 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Initial status hearing set for 12/5/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lees standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Advanced Cabinets Corp, Ewelina Filipek by Matthew Scott Kriezelman (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint for Declaratory Relief filed by Advanced Cabinets Corp, Ewelina Filipek; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16204530.(Kriezelman, Matthew) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
