Amaro v. Lake County et al
| Roberto Amaro |
| Armor Correctional Health, Lake County and Officer Micek |
| 1:2019cv05944 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") #3 is denied as incomplete. By November 18, 2019, Plaintiff must either: (1) pay the full civil case filing fee of $400.00; or (2) submit a completed application for leave to proceed IFP on the Court's form, along with certified trust fund account information as set forth below. If he does not comply, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed IFP, along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/21/2019. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| MAILED copy of Order dated 10/21/19 w/ Informa Pauperis Applicatyion to Roberto Amaro. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Roberto Amaro for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Roberto Amaro (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 8/30/2019)(sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
