Gordon v. Saul
| Carla Y. Gordon |
| Andrew Marshall Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2019cv05945 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Young B Kim |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is directed to file the administrative record by December 6, 2019. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by February 7, 2020. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by April 10, 2020. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, she may file a reply brief by April 24, 2020, but one is not required. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in her brief's statement of the issues. Mailed notice (ma,)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Young B. Kim for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C), parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 10/22/2019. (lma, ) Modified on 10/23/2019 (lma, ).
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court are stricken. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
|
Filing 7
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Flannery, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 6
DESIGNATION of Kathleen Marie Flannery as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Flannery, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 granted. The parties shall promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Do they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; or 2) Do they agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. Status hearing is set for 11/13/2019 at 9:30 AM. If the parties agree to consent or remand they may notify the court prior to the status hearing and no appearance will be required. Mailed notice (reg)
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Carla Y. Gordon for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Carla Y. Gordon by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Carla Y. Gordon; (Attachments: #1 ALJ decision)(Schultz, Barry)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
