RSUI Indemnity Company et al v. The Crossing Bar & Grill, Inc. et al
| Covington Specialty Insurance Company and RSUI Indemnity Company |
| Daniel Gagel and The Crossing Bar & Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv05974 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Covington Specialty Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company (Macklin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Daniel Gagel by Justin Henry Garner Appearance (Garner, Justin) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Crossing Bar & Grill, Inc. (ng, ) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by RSUI Indemnity Company, Covington Specialty Insurance Company. Daniel Gagel waiver sent on 9/10/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Macklin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 11/6/2019 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 10/30/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by RSUI Indemnity Company Corporate Disclosure Statement (Macklin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Covington Specialty Insurance Company Corporate Disclosure Statement (Macklin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Covington Specialty Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company by Anthony Hatzilabrou (Hatzilabrou, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Covington Specialty Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company by Jeremy Scott Macklin (Macklin, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Covington Specialty Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company by Michael Smith Knippen (Knippen, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by RSUI Indemnity Company, Covington Specialty Insurance Company; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16210366. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Macklin, Jeremy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
