Taramu v. The Boeing Company
Kebebua Legesse Taramu |
The Boeing Company |
1:2019cv06022 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jorge L Alonso |
Robert W Gettleman |
P.I.: Airplane Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: The Court orders all individual related actions, 19 C 5756, 19 C 5971, 19 C 6022, 19 C 6023,19 C 6025, 19 C 6077, 19 C 6079, 19 C 6099, 19 C 6102, 19 C 6149, 19 C 6153, 19 C 6176, 19 C 6177, 19 C 6180, 19 C 6181, to be consolidated under case number 19 C 2170. This order will be implemented by the Clerk of Court submitting JS-6 forms to the Administrative Office for the individual related actions. This will designate the individual related actions as closed for administrative and statistical purposes. This order will not be considered a dismissal or disposition of these actions on the merits. All future pleadings are to be filed in the consolidated case alone (19 C 2170). No pleadings should be filed in any of the individual related actions which are to be administratively closed. Any additional related cases filed in the future and assigned to Judge Alonso will also be administratively closed and consolidated with this case. Should any party believe at any point in the future that separate proceedings have become necessary for that party's particular claims, the party should make a motion in the consolidated case 19 C 2170 seeking relief. The Clerk is also directed to transfer all attorney appearances in the individual related actions to 19 C 2170. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/16/2019. Mailed notice. (bg, ) |
CONSOLIDATED for all purposes. See docket 19cv2170 for all further entries. (bg, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that the Hon. Jorge L. Alonso is presiding over 19 CV 2170, In re: Ethiopian Airlines Fight ET 302 Crash and the Hon. M. David Weisman as the designated magistrate judge; and It further appearing that the cases listed below are related to 19 CV 2170, In re: Ethiopian Airlines Fight ET 302 Crash pursuant to Local Rule 40.4; therefore It is hereby ordered that Judge Alonso shall be reassigned the cases listed below; and It is further ordered that Magistrate Judge Weisman shall be the designated magistrate judge in these cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/3/2019. (bg, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Due to a clerical error, the Order entered at #7 is to be removed from the docket. Mailed notice (cn). |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Entered in error. Modified on 9/9/2019 (cn). |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kebebua Legesse Taramu by John Vasilios Kalantzis (Kalantzis, John) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kebebua Legesse Taramu by Tracy A Brammeier (Brammeier, Tracy) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kebebua Legesse Taramu by Kevin P. Durkin (Durkin, Kevin) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kebebua Legesse Taramu by Robert A. Clifford (Clifford, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Clifford, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kebebua Legesse Taramu; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16215918.(Clifford, Robert) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taramu v. The Boeing Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Boeing Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kebebua Legesse Taramu | |
Represented By: | John Vasilios Kalantzis |
Represented By: | Tracy A Brammeier |
Represented By: | Kevin P. Durkin |
Represented By: | Robert A. Clifford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.