Stross v. LFLYNN LLC
| Alexander Stross |
| LFLYNN LLC |
| 1:2019cv06049 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing held. Parties discussing the possibility of settlement. Parties to file a joint status report by 11/22/2019. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 10 STATUS Report by Alexander Stross (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Alexander Stross for extension of time file pro hac vice motion (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alexander Stross by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Under Local Rule 83.14, "[a] member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of any state or of any United States district court may, upon motion, be permitted to argue or try a particular case in whole or in part subject to the requirements of LR83.12." Counsel for Plaintiff has not filed a motion for leave to appear pro hac vice as required by LR 83.14. Counsel for Plaintiff is given until October 18, 2019 to file a motion to appear pro hac vice. If counsel's motion is granted, Plaintiff is advised to read the Northern District of Illinois Local Rules. Failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in sanctions. The Court further notes that Plaintiff must file an appearance with the Court. Under Local Rule 83.16, "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in these rules, an appearance form shall be filed by every attorney or senior law student who represents a party in any proceeding brought in this Court, whether before a district judge or magistrate judge." Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/3/2019. Mailed notice (lma, )
|
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant LFLYNN LLC by Richard Elliott Halsey (Halsey, Richard) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: The Executive Committee, which administers the bar of this Court, notes the following: on August 8, 2019, attorney Richard Liebowitz applied for a pro hac vice efiling account in this Court. After obtaining the account, Mr. Liebowitz used the account to file the first of 12 cases electronically. In each of the cases, the filing fee was paid, but neither appearance forms nor pro hac vice petitions were filed. Local Rule 83.14; 83.16. For now, the Executive Committee posts this entry for the information and potential action of the assigned district judges in each case. Mailed notice. (sm, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 10/22/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 3 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alexander Stross; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16219384. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Copyright Form)(Liebowitz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stross v. LFLYNN LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Stross | |
| Represented By: | Richard P. Liebowitz |
| Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LFLYNN LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard Elliott Halsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
