Pearson et al v. Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University et al
| Krystal Simms and Celeste Pearson |
| Liz Wright, Northern Illinois University Collge of Law, Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University, Lisa Freeman and Karen Baker |
| 1:2019cv06060 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Because defendants have not yet filed an appearance, initial status set for 11/6/19 is stricken and re-set to 1/6/20 at 9:30am. No later than five business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Celeste Pearson, Krystal Simms as to Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University. (Attachments: #1 Summons executed Liz Wright, #2 summons executed Karen Baker, #3 summons executed Northern Illinois University Collge of Law, #4 summons executed Lisa Freeman) (bg, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Initial status hearing is set for 11/6/19 at 9:30 a.m. No later than five business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Karen Baker, Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University, Lisa Freeman, Northern Illinois University Collge of Law, Liz Wright (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Krystal Simms (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Celeste Pearson (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Celeste Pearson and Krystal Simms(bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
