Mandolini v. Arstrat, LLC
| Kelley R. Mandolini |
| Arstrat, LLC |
| 1:2019cv06106 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Status hearing held. The parties report that they are in the process of exchanging settlement proposals and that they are interested in participating in a settlement conference. As stated on the record, the deadline to complete discovery by 1/17/20 stands. The parties are further instructed to contact Courtroom Deputy Jenny Jauregui by no later than 11/15/19 to obtain settlement conference dates. The matter is set for a status hearing before the magistrate judge on 12/03/19 at 9:30 a.m. If prior to the status hearing the parties schedule a settlement conference, then the Court will strike the status hearing. Mailed notice. (jj, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The matter has been referred to this Court for the purpose of holding proceedings related to a settlement conference (doc. #13 ). The matter is set for an initial status hearing before Magistrate Judge Fuentes on 11/07/19 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #1838. Mailed notice. (jj, ) |
| Filing 13 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: settlement conference.(air, )Mailed notice. |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Initial status conference held. Plaintiff is directed to make a settlement demand promptly and defendant is to consider the demand in good faith. Fact discovery cutoff set on 1/17/20. This is a FIRM DATE. Status hearing set on 1/21/20 at 9:00 a.m. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Fuentes to conduct a settlement conference. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report (Initial) by Kelley R. Mandolini (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Arstrat, LLC(Kling, Maxwell) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Arstrat, LLC by Maxwell Anthony Kling (Kling, Maxwell) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Arstrat, LLC by Matthew Patrick Connelly (Connelly, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:This case is set for an initial status conference on 10/29/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status conferences, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==], and to submit the required initial status report no later than 10/22/19. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelley R. Mandolini as to Arstrat, LLC on 9/20/2019, answer due 10/11/2019. (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Arstrat, LLC (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Victor Thomas Metroff (Metroff, Victor) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kelley R. Mandolini; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16227559. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mandolini v. Arstrat, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelley R. Mandolini | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Victor Thomas Metroff |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arstrat, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Maxwell Anthony Kling |
| Represented By: | Matthew Patrick Connelly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
