Navarro v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
| Vianca Navarro |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. and The Hillshire Brands Company |
| 1:2019cv06117 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Vianca Navarro (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Vianca Navarro. The Hillshire Brands Company waiver sent on 11/4/2019, answer due 1/3/2020. (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Hillshire Brands Company by David G. Weldon (Weldon, David) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Hillshire Brands Company by Chad W. Moeller (Moeller, Chad) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Vianca Navarro re amended complaint #11 (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED complaint by Vianca Navarro against All Defendants (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 11/14/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Vianca Navarro. Tyson Foods, Inc. waiver sent on 9/12/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. by David Graham Weldon (Weldon, David) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tyson Foods, Inc. (Moeller, Chad) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. by Chad W. Moeller (Moeller, Chad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Vianca Navarro by Jill S Weinstein (Weinstein, Jill) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Vianca Navarro by Erika E. Pedersen (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pedersen, Erika) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Vianca Navarro; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16230149.(Pedersen, Erika) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
