Eberly v. Harnack et al
Marc Eberly |
Chris Peeler, GABE VELAZQUEZ, Kane County, Willie M Mayes, Raul Salinas, MIKE WILGOSIEWICZ, RYAN ROJKOWSKI, Jonathon Harnack, Brian J McCarty and CHERYL LYNE |
1:2019cv06129 |
September 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jonathon Harnack, Kane County, Cheryl Lyne, Willie M Mayes, Willie M Mayes, Brian J McCarty, Chris Peeler, Ryan Rojkowski, Raul Salinas, Gabe Velazquez, Mike Wilgosiewicz by Dawn Elizabeth Troost (Troost, Dawn) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Marc Eberly. All Defendants. (Cronauer, Christopher) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:In view of the status report, which says that the waiver of service resulted in an answer deadline in 11/2019 (and that Defendants plan to file a motion to dismiss), the status hearing of 10/22/2019 is reset to 11/25/2019 at 10:30 a.m. Plaintiff shall promptly file the returns of the waivers of service so that the Court can ascertain the exact answer deadline. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jonathon Harnack, Kane County, Cheryl Lyne, Willie M Mayes, Willie M Mayes, Brian J McCarty, Chris Peeler, Ryan Rojkowski, Raul Salinas, Gabe Velazquez, Mike Wilgosiewicz by Joseph F Lulves (Lulves, Joseph) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Marc Eberly of Joint Initial Status Report (Cronauer, Christopher) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mma, ) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Initial status hearing set for 10/22/2019 at 9 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cronauer, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marc Eberly; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16231618. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Merit Board Findings)(Cronauer, Christopher) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.