Rehn v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
John Rehn |
Chicago Union Station Company, Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a Metra, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, LP, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation |
1:2019cv06204 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by Catherine Jeanne OSuilleabhain for presentment of motion for protective order #22 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/26/2019 at 09:45 AM. (OSuilleabhain, Catherine) |
Filing 22 MOTION by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation for protective order Uncontested Motion for a Qualified Protective Order (OSuilleabhain, Catherine) |
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 11/6/2019. Case management conference set for 12/5/2019 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff's motion to dismiss #18 is granted and this case is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants, Chicago Union Station, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas (Illinois) LP and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Rail road Corporation, d/b/a Metra. Motion hearing set for 11/7/2019 is stricken. Initial status hearing set for 11/6/2019 to stand. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Peter F. Higgins for presentment of motion to dismiss #18 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/7/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Higgins, Peter) |
Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff John Rehn to dismiss (Higgins, Peter) |
Filing 17 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (OSuilleabhain, Catherine) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service Notice of Service NRPC's Mandatory Initial Disclosures by Catherine Jeanne OSuilleabhain on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (OSuilleabhain, Catherine) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation by Thomas Joseph Platt (Platt, Thomas) (Docket Text modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 10/28/2019 (aee, ). |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation by Julie Ann Daily (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Daily, Julie) (Docket Text modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 10/28/2019 (aee, ). |
Filing 13 MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY RESPONSES by John Rehn (Higgins, Peter) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Oral motion to reset initial status hearing is granted. Status hearing previously set for 11/7/2019 is reset for 11/6/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION by John Rehn (Higgins, Peter) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey:This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 11/7/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 10/28/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Laing, Susan) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Catherine Jeanne OSuilleabhain (OSuilleabhain, Catherine) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Rehn by Peter F. Higgins (Higgins, Peter) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (rp, ) |
Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record.(rp, ) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service Proof of Filing Copy of Filed Notice of Removal in Circuit Court by Susan Kay Laing on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Susan Kay Laing (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019 L 10086) filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16245947. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Laing, Susan) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ng, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.