Boyce v. Doe et al
Anthony Letroy Boyce |
John Mahoney, John Doe, Lisa Madigan and Kimberly Foxx |
1:2019cv06254 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Mailed copy of Order #7 and Judgment #8 on 10/25/2019 to Plaintiff. (cdh, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 10/25/2019. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(cdh, ) |
Filing 6 LETTER from Anthony Boyce dated 9/22/2019. (Envelope postmarked 9/23/2019) (Document does not display case number). (pj, ) |
Filing 5 LETTER from Anthony Letroy Boyce dated 9/18/2019 (Envelope postmarked 9/20/2019) (Document does not display case number). (sxb, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Anthony Letroy Boyce for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibit) (Received for docketing 9/19/2019) (sxb, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Anthony Letroy Boyce for appointment and clarify certain matters of said case (Exhibits) (Received for docketing 9/19/2019) (sxb, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (Received for docketing 9/19/2019) (sxb, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 3 copies by Anthony Letroy Boyce (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 9/10/2019) (Received for docketing 9/19/2019)(sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.