Chavez v. Youth Conservation Corps.
| Leslie Arevalo Chavez |
| Youth Conservation Corps., Lake-County Sheriff's Office and Waukegan Police |
| 1:2019cv06303 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff's amended complaint #10 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff must submit a second amended complaint by November 22, 2019. Failure to do so will result in summary dismissal of this matter with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank amended civil-rights complaint form and instructions along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/21/2019. Mailed notice (aee, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 10/21/19, a blank amended civil-rights complaint form and instructions to Plaintiff. (aee, ) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED complaint by Leslie Arevalo Chavez against Waukegan Police, Lake-County Sheriff's Office and terminating Youth Conservation Corps. (ph, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 demonstrates that she cannot prepay the filing fee, and is thus granted. Summons, however, shall not issue at this time, because the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint #1 for improper joinder. Plaintiff is granted until October 22, 2019 to submit an amended complaint as detailed in this order. Failure to submit an amended complaint by that date will result in summary dismissal of this lawsuit. Furthermore, Plaintiff's motion for recruitment of an attorney #5 is denied without prejudice to refiling at a later time. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an amended employment-discrimination complaint form and instructions, an amended civil-rights complaint form and instructions, and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on October 1, 2019. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| MAILED Plaintiff an amended employment-discrimination complaint form and instructions, an amended civil-rights complaint form and instructions, and a copy of order #9 dated 10/1/2019. (ph, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (rp, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Leslie Arevalo Chavez for attorney representation (rp, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Leslie Arevalo Chavez for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (rp, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Leslie Arevalo Chavez (rp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (rp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and one copy by Leslie Arevalo Chavez (Exhibits)(rp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
