Fitzhenry v. GOHEALTH, LLC
Mark Fitzhenry |
GOHEALTH, LLC |
1:2019cv06318 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 11/08/2019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Fitzhenry by Lauren E. Urban (Urban, Lauren) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Fitzhenry by Jonathan Patrick Misny (Misny, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mark Fitzhenry by Brian Kevin Murphy (Murphy, Brian) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Murphy, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint filed by Mark Fitzhenry; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16261330.(Murphy, Brian) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant GOHEALTH, LLC (mc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fitzhenry v. GOHEALTH, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GOHEALTH, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Fitzhenry | |
Represented By: | Lauren E. Urban |
Represented By: | Jonathan Patrick Misny |
Represented By: | Brian Kevin Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.