HB Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-17
HB Productions, Inc. |
Does 1-17, John Doe 5, Doe No. 15 and John Doe 6 |
1:2019cv06363 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Mary M Rowland |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by HB Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Doe Defendant No. 15 (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants John Doe 5, John Doe 6 by Erin Kathryn Russell (Russell, Erin) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Plaintiff's motion for leave to take discovery prior to Rule 26(f) conference #10 is granted. No appearance is required on 10/10/2019. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for discovery #10 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/10/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by HB Productions, Inc. in support of motion for discovery #10 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff HB Productions, Inc. for discovery Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Status hearing set for 12/4/2019 at 09:00 AM. The filing of a joint status report is not required.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/26/2019.(pk, ) |
Filing 7 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HB Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and Local Rule 3.2 (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
Filing 5 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(pk, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HB Productions, Inc. by William Benjamin Kalbac (Kalbac, William) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HB Productions, Inc. by Michael A. Hierl (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hierl, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by HB Productions, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16271363. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Hierl, Michael) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.