Phillips v. Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Phillips
Defendant: Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv06375
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(Mcqueen, Allison)
November 22, 2019 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nathaniel Phillips by Alexander James Taylor (Taylor, Alexander)
November 20, 2019 Filing 13 STATUS Report (Joint) by Nathaniel Phillips (Hijazin, Majdi)
November 19, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE by Nathaniel Phillips of Settlement as to Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc. Only (Hijazin, Majdi)
November 1, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted. Responsive pleadings to be filed by 11/22/2019. No appearance necessary on 11/5/2019. Mailed notice. (ym, )
October 25, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Allison Leigh Mcqueen for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 11/5/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Mcqueen, Allison)
October 25, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Mcqueen, Allison)
October 25, 2019 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Mcqueen, Allison)
October 25, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. by Allison Leigh Mcqueen (Mcqueen, Allison)
October 10, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathaniel Phillips as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. (Hijazin, Majdi)
October 10, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathaniel Phillips as to Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc. on 10/8/2019, answer due 10/29/2019. (Hijazin, Majdi)
October 1, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (jg, )
September 30, 2019 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman and is set for a status hearing on 11/25/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are reminded to review the timelines set out in this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, )
September 26, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, )
September 25, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nathaniel Phillips by Majdi Y. Hijazin (Hijazin, Majdi)
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nathaniel Phillips; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16274303. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hijazin, Majdi)
September 25, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phillips v. Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credit Bureau of New Ulm, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Allison Leigh Mcqueen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Phillips
Represented By: Majdi Y. Hijazin
Represented By: Alexander James Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?