Cohan v. Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC
Howard Cohan |
Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC and Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC doing business as Loews Chicago Hotel |
1:2019cv06446 |
September 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Gary Feinerman |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal #13 , the terms of which are set forth therein. The status hearing set for 1/9/2020 #12 is stricken. Civil case closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Howard Cohan pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Defendant's motion for extension of time #10 is granted. The time for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to 12/17/2019. MIDP disclosures shall be served by 1/16/2020. Motion hearing date of 12/4/2019 #11 is stricken. Status hearing set for 12/9/2019 #9 is stricken and reset to 1/9/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags, ) |
Filing 11 UNOPPOSED NOTICE of Motion by Kevin Andrew Fritz for presentment of extension of time #10 before Honorable Gary Feinerman on 12/4/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC for extension of time UNOPPOSED (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The status hearing set for 11/12/2019 #6 is stricken and re-set for 12/9/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Howard Cohan. Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC waiver sent on 10/4/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC by Kevin Andrew Fritz (Fritz, Kevin) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 11/12/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 11/12/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Cohan by Marshall J. Burt (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Howard Cohan ; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16283695.(Burt, Marshall) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (axc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.