Prince et al v. Bridge et al
| Darrell Prince, Doris Prince, Jacquelyn Prince, Angel Prince, Earl Prince Jr, Derrick Prince and Ingrid Prince |
| John Doe, John Doe Sheriff Deputies, John Bridge, Unkown 911 Operator, Michael Krame, Menz, City of Chicago, Jane Doe, Chicago Department of Sanitation, George Bridges, County of Cook, Firm One, Unknown Owners and Buyers, Equity One LLC and Private Equity LLC |
| 1:2019cv06456 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| John Z Lee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings, pursuant to IOP 13. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/12/2019. (pj, ) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ingrid Prince for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pj, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Plaintiffs have filed a complaint #1 , but have neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is granted until 10/17/19 to either (1) pay the filing fee or (2) submit an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not do either of those things by 10/17/19, this case will be dismissed.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, ) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Criminal Order of Protection of Plaintiffs Against Doctors of Cook County, Chicago Police Department (pj, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Plaintiffs (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
