Burke v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees
| Mary Beth Burke |
| Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees |
| 1:2019cv06460 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the Courtroom Deputy on 11/1/19Mailed notice(ca, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (ca, ). |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff Mary Beth Burke, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees ("the Board"), seeking reconsideration of the outcome of a case that was resolved almost twenty years ago. See Burke v. Chi. Sch. Reform Bd., No. 00 CV 3168 (N.D. Ill.) (Burke I). The parties reached a settlement in Burke I in 2001, and that case was dismissed with prejudice. For that reason, Burke's request for reconsideration #1 is denied and her in forma pauperis application #3 and motion for attorney representation #4 are denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/4/2019. Mailed notice. (bg, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Mary Beth Burke of Change of Address (Linked document does not contain case number) (bg, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Mary Beth Burke for attorney representation (Exhibit) (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Mary Beth Burke for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibit) (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Mary Beth Burke (Exhibits) (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burke v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Beth Burke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
