Torres et al v. Metz et al
| Rosee Torres and Noel Torres |
| MR Capital Group, LLC and Robert Metz |
| 1:2019cv06526 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Status hearing held. Pro se Plaintiff Rosee Torres appeared and reported that Pro se Plaintiff Noel Torres would be unable to appear today due to medical reasons. As detailed during the hearing, by 01/17/2020, Plaintiffs shall file a brief explaining (1) why the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not defeat subject matter jurisdiction (Plaintiffs are familiar with the concept from the order in 19 C 112); and (2) why the allegations against Defendants satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)'s particularity requirement. Also, by 12/06/2019, Defendants will be filing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion (and possibly also adding jurisdictional arguments). Status hearing set for 01/31/2020 at 8:30 a.m. The Court notified Plaintiff of the availability of the Pro Se Help Desk, and what to bring to an appointment (which should be made well in advance of the 01/17/2020 deadline). Information about how to make an appointment is available on the Northern District of Illinois' website. Emailed and mailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiffs' motion #13 for default is denied in light of the filing of the appearance on behalf of defense counsel. A reasonable extension to respond to the complaint is warranted. This will be discussed at the 11/22/2019 status hearing. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Rosee Torres for presentment of motion for default #13 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/21/2019 at 8:30 AM. (pj, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for default by Plaintiff Rosee Torres (pj, ) |
| Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) , filed by Defendants MR Capital Group, LLC, Robert Metz. (Metz, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Defendants' Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by MR Capital Group, LLC, Robert Metz (Metz, Robert) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 11/18/2019 ) (pj, ). |
| Filing 10 MANDATORY Initial Discovery Report filed by Plaintiffs Noel Torres, Rosee Torres. (pj, ) |
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT 3 regarding initial status report #8 by Plaintiffs Noel Torres, Rosee Torres (pj, ) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STATUS Report by Noel Torres, Rosee Torres. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(pj, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants MR Capital Group, LLC, Robert Metz by Robert T. Metz (Metz, Robert) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 11/22/2019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiffs Noel Torres, Rosee Torres (pj, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pj, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rosee Torres, Noel Torres; Jury Demand. (Exhibits) (pj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Robert Metz (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
