Pastore v. Saul
Plaintiff: Rose A. Pastore
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv06544
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: M David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. Parties shall comply with the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Mailed notice (ao,)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable M. David Weisman, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Manish S. Shah no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/22/2019. (lma, )
November 22, 2019 Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marcus, Meredith)
November 22, 2019 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Kristen Elise Rau as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Rau, Kristen)
October 8, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief shall be filed 60 days after the Administrative Record is filed on the court's docket. Defendant SSA's response shall be filed 45 days after the plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed 14 days thereafter. The court will issue a ruling via CM/ECF. Notices mailed. (psm, )
October 2, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt)
October 1, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose A. Pastore by Meredith Emily Marcus (Marcus, Meredith)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rose A. Pastore by Frederick J. Daley, Jr (Daley, Frederick)
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Rose A. Pastore for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Daley, Frederick)
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rose A. Pastore; (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Daley, Frederick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pastore v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rose A. Pastore
Represented By: Meredith Emily Marcus
Represented By: Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Kristen Elise Rau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?