Gupta v. Kraus et al
Ashish Gupta |
John Doe (1), Anaisa Alice Claudio, Jason Mitchem, Michael Kraus, States Atty of Will Cty, Dane Stepien, John Doe (2), Target Corporation, DET Draxler, Mary Rose Kendall, Mark Shilfka and SGT Schrubb |
1:2019cv06651 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Initial status hearing set for 12/11/19 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is directed to complete and submit USM-285 forms for every Defendant he wants served. USMS to serve process. As Plaintiff appears capable of representing himself at this stage, his motion for attorney representation #3 is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage in the proceedings. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Ashish Gupta. (gcy, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Ashish Gupta for attorney representation. (gcy, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ashish Gupta; Jury Demand. (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.