Moser v. The City of Chicago et al
| Brian Moser |
| Randy Conner, CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO and The City of Chicago |
| 1:2019cv06659 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 1/3/2020. The Court will hold a status hearing in open court on 1/10/2020 at 9:45 a.m. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Randy Conner, The City of Chicago by Rena M. Honorow (Honorow, Rena) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Susan Margaret O'Keefe (O'Keefe, Susan) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Moser by Anthony J. Peraica (Peraica, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Brian Moser; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16316437. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Peraica, Anthony) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (axc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
