Al Juboori v. Cuccinelli
Mohammed Al Juboori |
Kenneth T Cuccinelli |
1:2019cv06730 |
October 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Elaine E Bucklo |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: At the plaintiff's request, Status hearing previously set for 11/22/2019 is stricken and reset for 2/3/2020 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
Filing 9 Plaintiff's Application to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Counsel by Mohammed Al Juboori (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mohammed Al Juboori as to Kenneth T Cuccinelli served on 10/22/2019, answer due 12/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Proof of Service on Defendant, #2 Certificate of Service Proof of Service on Attorney General)(Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kenneth T Cuccinelli (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kenneth T Cuccinelli (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Status hearing set for 11/22/2019 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice (reg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sturman, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mohammed Al Juboori; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16328337.(Sturman, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Al Juboori v. Cuccinelli | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kenneth T Cuccinelli | |
Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
Represented By: | Craig Arthur Oswald |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Inez Treacy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mohammed Al Juboori | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Roger Sturman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.