Morales v. Saul
Plaintiff: Ricardo J. Morales
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv06802
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Referring Judge: Jeffrey T Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. A briefing schedule will be set after the Administrative Record is filed. Mailed notice (ber, )
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings parties have consented to reassignment. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/22/2019.(jh, )
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:In light of the joint consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, the status hearing of 11/25/2019 is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee.Emailed notice (slb, )
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Hartzler, Alex)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Alex Harms Hartzler as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Hartzler, Alex)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion #4 to proceed in forma pauperis is granted due to financial indigency. The Court encourages the parties to consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. An initial status hearing is set for 11/25/2019 at 10:30 a.m.Emailed notice (slb, )
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ricardo J. Morales for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ricardo J. Morales by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Ricardo J. Morales; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry) Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 10/16/2019 (jh, ).
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morales v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo J. Morales
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Represented By: Alex Harms Hartzler
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?