Medical Business Associates Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Medical Business Associates Inc. |
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Kathy A Baran, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and Kathy Baran |
1:2019cv06873 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Andrea R Wood |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STATUS Report by Medical Business Associates Inc. (Shah, Tejas) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kathy Baran, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kathy Baran, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Oswald, Craig) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Kathy Baran, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jg, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 12/18/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Medical Business Associates Inc. by Tejas Niranjan Shah (Shah, Tejas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Shah, Tejas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Relief and Review of Agency Action Under the Administrative Procedures Act filed by Medical Business Associates Inc.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16348103. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - H-1B Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Request for Evidence, #3 Exhibit C - Response to Request for Evidence, #4 Exhibit D - H-1B Decision, #5 Exhibit E - I-290B Filing, #6 Exhibit F - I-290B Decision)(Shah, Tejas) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.