Krol v. Klinger et al
| Katarzyna Krol |
| Kenneth Cuccinelli and Michael Klinger |
| 1:2019cv06878 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the status report, R. 9 at 2, which states that the answer deadline is 01/03/2020 and that the parties have agreed to a 30-day extension to answer, the answer deadline is now 02/03/2020. Status hearing of 12/16/2019 is reset to 02/04/2020 at 9 a.m., with another status report due by 12 p.m. on 02/03/2020. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 9 STATUS Report Joint Initial by Katarzyna Krol (Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth Cuccinelli, Michael Klinger (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kenneth Cuccinelli, Michael Klinger (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Initial status hearing set for 12/16/2019 at 10:00 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang by lot for all further proceedings. Honorable Charles P. Kocoras no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/18/19. (smm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Kenneth Cuccinelli, Michael Klinger (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Katarzyna Krol by Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure (Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Hearing on Naturalization Application filed by Katarzyna Krol; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16349023.(Mcclure, Lauren) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
