Taylor v. State of Illinois et al
| Alexander Taylor |
| City of Chicago and State of Illinois |
| 1:2019cv06945 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to either (1) submit a renewed application in accordance with this order; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to fully comply with this order by December 10, 2019, will result in dismissal of this case. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/12/2019. Mailed notice(jh, )
|
| MAILED Order dated 11/12/2019 with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis form to the Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Alexander Taylor for attorney assistance (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Alexander Taylor for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Alexander Taylor. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
