Yim v. United States of America
| Chung Yim |
| United States of America |
| 1:2019cv07077 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chung Yim as to United States of America served on 12/9/2019, answer due 2/7/2020 (Grinnalds, Robin)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (kl, )
|
|
Filing 6
DESIGNATION of Alex Harms Hartzler as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America (Hartzler, Alex)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 1/9/20 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, )
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chung Yim by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chung Yim by Robin Ann Grinnalds (Grinnalds, Robin)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Chung Yim; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16380734. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Grinnalds, Robin)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yim v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chung Yim | |
| Represented By: | Edward M. Fox |
| Represented By: | Robin Ann Grinnalds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Alex Harms Hartzler |
| Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
