Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: CLAUZELL WILLIAMS and Clauzell H. Williams
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv07116
Filed: October 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Dawson, Brody)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The parties shall exchange MIDP disclosures by 12/16/19. All fact discovery shall be noticed in time for completion by 6/5/20. The plaintiff is directed to make a settlement demand with MIDP disclosures, and defendant must respond to plaintiff's demand before 1/16/20. Status hearing is reset to 3/5/20 at 9:30 a.m. and no appearance on 11/20/19 is necessary. Any agreed proposed confidentiality orders may be submitted to proposed_order_shah@ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties may email susan_mcclintic@ilnd.uscourts.gov for a settlement referral. Notices mailed. (psm, )
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STATUS Report Joint Initial by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Dawson, Brody)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 11/20/19 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, )
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Union Pacific Railroad Company(Dawson, Brody)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company by Sarah-Joel Martine Privert (Privert, Sarah-Joel)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, )
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (pj, )
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Disclosure STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation (Dawson, Brody)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation by Brody Elizabeth Dawson (Dawson, Brody)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Dawson, Brody)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019L010384) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16386634. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Dawson, Brody)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Brody Elizabeth Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Brody Elizabeth Dawson
Represented By: Sarah-Joel Martine Privert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLAUZELL WILLIAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clauzell H. Williams
Represented By: Michael Irving Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?