Mandolini v. Credit Collection Services, Inc.
| Kelley R. Mandolini |
| Credit Collection Services, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv07142 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Kelley R. Mandolini of Settlement (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 1/8/20 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notices mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Kelley R. Mandolini. Credit Collection Services, Inc. waiver sent on 10/31/2019, answer due 12/30/2019. (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Victor Thomas Metroff (Metroff, Victor) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kelley R. Mandolini by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kelley R. Mandolini; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16390354. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mandolini v. Credit Collection Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Collection Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelley R. Mandolini | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Victor Thomas Metroff |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
