Nordstrom v. Dial Senior Management, Inc.
Jennifer Nordstrom |
Dial Senior Management, Inc. |
1:2019cv07183 |
October 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On Defendant's motion to dismiss #14 , Plaintiff's response is due by 01/13/2020. Defendant's reply is due by 02/03/2020. Discovery is stayed during the pendency of the motion, but defense counsel must have another communication with Defendant to ensure that a comprehensive litigation hold is in place. Plaintiff also may confer with the defense about the scope of the litigation hold if there is any concern. Status hearing of 12/17/2019 is reset to 03/04/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 16 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by Jennifer Nordstrom (Ficzko, Andrew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Matthew C. Wolfe for presentment of motion to dismiss #14 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 12/17/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant Dial Senior Management, Inc. to dismiss Dial Senior Management, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant's unopposed extension motion #8 to respond to the complaint is granted to 12/04/2019. Initial status hearing set for 12/17/2019 at 9 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Nordstrom by Ryan F Stephan (Stephan, Ryan) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Nordstrom by James B. Zouras (Zouras, James) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Nordstrom by Andrew C. Ficzko (Ficzko, Andrew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Matthew C. Wolfe for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/12/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Dial Senior Management, Inc. for extension of time to file answer Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (pk, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dial Senior Management, Inc. by Melissa Anne Siebert (Siebert, Melissa) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dial Senior Management, Inc. (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dial Senior Management, Inc. by Matthew C. Wolfe (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wolfe, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2019CH11108) filed by Dial Senior Management, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16395755. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Blanke, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Removal in State Court)(Wolfe, Matthew) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nordstrom v. Dial Senior Management, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jennifer Nordstrom | |
Represented By: | Andrew C. Ficzko |
Represented By: | Ryan F Stephan |
Represented By: | James B. Zouras |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dial Senior Management, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew C. Wolfe |
Represented By: | Melissa Anne Siebert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.