Central Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Brown R Cartage Company
| Northern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund, Market Promotion Fund, Midwest Region Foundation For Fair Contracting, Central Laborers Annuity Fund, Midwest Region Organization Committee, North Central Illinois Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, Central Laborers Pension Fund, Great Plains Laborers Vacation Fund, North Central Laborers-Employers Cooperation and Education Trust, Construction Industry Advancement Fund, Great Plains Laborers District Council Working Dues Check Off Fund, Central Laborers Welfare Fund, Illinois Laborers and Contractors Joint Apprenticeship & Training Trust Fund, Central Laborers' Welfare Fund, Great Plains Laborers' District Council Working Dues Check Off Fund, Great Plains Laborers' Vacation Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Central Laborers' Annuity Fund and North Central Illinois Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund |
| Brown R Cartage Company |
| 1:2019cv07185 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1131 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status hearing is set for January 27, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Report" on the Court's website. At least two weeks before the hearing, the parties must discuss settlement in good faith, and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. The parties also must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court before the initial status hearing. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) by January 22, 2020. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. Second, the parties must submit a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Please note that the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report on the Court's docket, but must email (i.e., not file on the docket) the proposed Scheduling Order to the Court's proposed order inbox. The initial status hearing will be the scheduling conference contemplated by Rule 16(b). Lead counsel for the parties must participate in the initial status conference. Counsel must be prepared to discuss the status of settlement, as well as the proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process by one week before the initial status hearing, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status hearing. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Brown R Cartage Company (Lam, Tina) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lma, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Central Laborers Annuity Fund, Central Laborers Pension Fund, Central Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Industry Advancement Fund, Great Plains Laborers District Council Working Dues Check Off Fund, Great Plains Laborers Vacation Fund, Illinois Laborers and Contractors Joint Apprenticeship & Training Trust Fund, Market Promotion Fund, Midwest Region Foundation For Fair Contracting, Midwest Region Organization Committee, North Central Illinois Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, North Central Laborers-Employers Cooperation and Education Trust, Northern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund by Storm Anthony Saponaro (Saponaro, Storm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Saponaro, Storm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Illinois Laborers and Contractors Joint Apprenticeship & Training Trust Fund, Market Promotion Fund, Central Laborers Welfare Fund, Midwest Region Foundation For Fair Contracting, Great Plains Laborers District Council Working Dues Check Off Fund, Midwest Region Organization Committee, Central Laborers Annuity Fund, Construction Industry Advancement Fund, North Central Illinois Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, Central Laborers Pension Fund, North Central Laborers-Employers Cooperation and Education Trust, Great Plains Laborers Vacation Fund, Northern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16396646.(Saponaro, Storm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
