Bowers v. Advocate Health Care Network
| Donald A. Bowers |
| ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation d/b/a Advocate Trinity Hospital, Advocate Aurora Health and Advocate Health Care Network |
| 1:2019cv07210 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Unopposed motion to reset the initial status hearing is #11 is granted. Initial status hearing set for 12/18/2019 is stricken and reset to 1/16/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Joint status report is due by 1/14/2020. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Donald A. Bowerschange of status date (unopposed) (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 10 STATUS Report Joint by Donald A. Bowers (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Donald A. Bowers. All Defendants. (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 8 STATUS Report Plaintiff's by Donald A. Bowers (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Advocate Aurora Health, Advocate Health Care Network by Maurice Grant (Grant, Maurice) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Advocate Aurora Health, Advocate Health Care Network by Carlos Eduardo Carabajal (Carabajal, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 12/18/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) Modified on 11/6/2019 (cdh, ). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Donald A. Bowers by John Craig Ireland (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Donald A. Bowers; jury demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16399880.(Ireland, John) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
