Muhammad v. The Fitness Formula, LTD.
| Rasul Muhammad |
| The Fitness Formula, LTD. |
| 1:2019cv07240 |
| November 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Rasul Muhammad regarding Summons and Complaint served on The Fitness Formula, LTD on 11/19/2019 (Kramer, Raymond) |
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendant's agreed motion to extend time to file responsive pleading #9 is granted to 1/10/20. Motion hearing date of 12/9/19 is stricken. Initial status hearing set for 1/21/20 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website.Notice mailed by judge's staff. (lf, )
|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. by Robert Jerald Emanuel (Emanuel, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Bart Thomas Murphy for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/9/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Murphy, Bart) |
| Filing 10 FRCP 7.1 Disclosure Statement and L.R.3.2 Notification of Affilidated STATEMENT by The Fitness Formula, LTD. (Murphy, Bart) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed Motion) (Murphy, Bart) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. by Isaac J. Colunga (Colunga, Isaac) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. by Martha Larson Kohlstrand (Kohlstrand, Martha) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. by Bart Thomas Murphy On Behalf of Martha Kohlstrand (Murphy, Bart) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. by Bart Thomas Murphy (Murphy, Bart) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Fitness Formula, LTD. (acm, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rasul Muhammad by Raymond Joseph Kramer, III (Kramer, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kramer, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rasul Muhammad; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16401829.(Kramer, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
