Faber v. Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nick Faber
Defendant: Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc.
Respondent: U.S. Department of Labor
Case Number: 1:2019cv07360
Filed: November 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE by Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. re response to motion, #15 (Quinn, John)
December 27, 2019 Filing 15 RESPONSE by Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. to MOTION by Respondent U.S. Department of Labor to vacate MOTION by Respondent U.S. Department of Labor to dismiss State Court Order and Petition for Rule to Show Cause #7 (Quinn, John)
December 18, 2019 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nick Faber by Daniel Adam Hantman (Hantman, Daniel)
December 18, 2019 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nick Faber by Shawn M. Staples (Staples, Shawn)
December 4, 2019 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. unopposed motion for extension of time to file response #10 is granted to and including 12/27/2019. The Government's reply is due 01/08/2020. Status hearing set for 12/18/2019 is stricken and reset to 02/04/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by John Leo Quinn for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #10 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/5/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Quinn, John)
November 27, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion to vacate, motion to dismiss #7 (Quinn, John)
November 13, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the government's motion #7 to vacate the state court order and to dismiss the show-cause petition, state-court Plaintiff Nick Faber shall file a response by 11/27/2019. The government's reply is due by 12/09/2019. The Court urges the parties to confer so that any proper Touhy process is followed so that this discovery matter can be resolved promptly. The case is administratively terminated because it is a subpoena-compliance matter. Status hearing set for 12/18/2019 at 9 a.m.Emailed notice (slb, )
November 12, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Ernest Yi Ling for presentment of motion to vacate, motion to dismiss #7 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/19/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Ling, Ernest)
November 12, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION by Respondent U.S. Department of Labor to vacate , MOTION by Respondent U.S. Department of Labor to dismiss State Court Order and Petition for Rule to Show Cause (Ling, Ernest)
November 11, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. by John Leo Quinn (Quinn, John)
November 7, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, )
November 7, 2019 Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (bg, )
November 6, 2019 Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Respondent U.S. Department of Labor (Ling, Ernest)
November 6, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois, case number (18 L 964) filed by U.S. Department of Labor Ex. 1: state court petition and order (Ling, Ernest)
November 6, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ling, Ernest)
November 6, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faber v. Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nick Faber
Represented By: Shawn M. Staples
Represented By: Daniel Adam Hantman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susman Linoleum & Rug Co., Inc.
Represented By: John Leo Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Department of Labor
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?