IVEC Systems, LLC v. Abicor Binzel USA, Inc.
| IVEC Systems, LLC |
| Abicor Binzel USA, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv07457 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Attorney Appearance Form by Abicor Binzel USA, Inc. (Farbman, Leon) |
| Filing 16 Attorney Appearance Form by Abicor Binzel USA, Inc. (Schiller, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing previously set for 1/8/20 is stricken and reset to 1/28/20 at 9:30 a.m. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, ) |
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 1/8/20 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notices mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service of Lanham Act Mediation Program Materials by Tiffany D Gehrke on behalf of IVEC Systems, LLC (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by IVEC Systems, LLC. Abicor Binzel USA, Inc. waiver sent on 11/20/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff IVEC Systems, LLC by Benjamin T Horton (Horton, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 9 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 8 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff IVEC Systems, LLC by Brian G Gilpin (Gilpin, Brian) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff IVEC Systems, LLC by Jennifer L. Gregor (Gregor, Jennifer) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Lam, Tina) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff IVEC Systems, LLC by Tiffany D Gehrke (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by IVEC Systems, LLC (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by IVEC Systems, LLC (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gehrke, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by IVEC Systems, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16427128. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: FUMEVAC Reg Cert, #2 Exhibit B: Promotional Materials, #3 Exhibit C: Defendant Xtract Brochure, #4 Exhibit D: Defendant XFUME VAC Brochure, #5 Exhibit E: IVEC FumeVac-FABTECH Ad, #6 Exhibit F: Defendant Febtech Preview Page)(Gehrke, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
