Davis v. The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired
| Taneesha Davis |
| The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired |
| 1:2019cv07485 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired by William Patrick Conlon (Conlon, William) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Kevin David Kelly for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 1/16/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Kelly, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired for extension of time to file answer Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (Kelly, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired by Kevin David Kelly (Kelly, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED complaint by Taneesha Davis against The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Fradin, Michael) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who are Blind or Visually Impaired (mc, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Status hearing set for 2/18/2020 at 9:30 AM. At the initial hearing, parties to report on the following: 1. Possibility of settlement. 2. If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to prepare the case for resolution. Lead counsel for each party is required to attend the initial hearing. Failure to appear at any scheduled court hearing may result in the dismissal of claims for want of prosecution. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(a)(1), service of motions and notice of motions must be accomplished no later than 4:00 p.m. of the third business day preceding the date of presentment. This includes delivering a hard copy of the motion and notice of motion to Courtroom Deputy, Vettina Franklin at room 1744B no later than 4:00 p.m. the day of filing. Failure to comply may result in the striking of the matter from the Court's motion call. The Court requires hard copies of all documents be submitted to Courtroom Deputy, Vettina Franklin at room 1744B the same day of filing. Failure to comply may result in the striking of the document from the record. The Court directs counsel's attention to its Motion Schedule and Case Management Procedures located at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff is directed to advise all other parties of the Court's action herein. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT (Corrected Caption) filed by Taneesha Davis; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Fradin, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Lam, Tina) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Taneesha Davis by Michael Louis Fradin (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Taneesha Davis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16432361. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fradin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
