Courtney v. United States of America et al
Arkita Courtney |
Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation, UNITED STATES and United States of America |
1:2019cv07486 |
November 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arkita Courtney by Terrance M Nofsinger (Nofsinger, Terrance) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: : The Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #8 . Defendant's responsive pleading is due by 2/5/20. The Court strikes the status date set for 1/14/20 and resets it to 2/11/20 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation by Elizabeth L Casey (Casey, Elizabeth) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation by Elizabeth Rosenberg Grover (Grover, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Dominick W. Savaiano for presentment of extension of time #8 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 1/7/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Savaiano, Dominick) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Savaiano, Dominick) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation by Dominick W. Savaiano (Savaiano, Dominick) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Advocate Health & Hospital Corporation (jg, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jg, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 1/14/2020 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 1/7/2020. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arkita Courtney by Edward W. McNabola (McNabola, Edward) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arkita Courtney by Thomas Ryan Trench (Trench, Thomas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Trench, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arkita Courtney; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16433129. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Jury Demand, #2 Affidavit With Medical Report, #3 Affidavit Of Damages)(Trench, Thomas) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Lam, Tina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.