Byles v. Aramark
| Oscar Lee Byles |
| Aramark |
| 1:2019cv07494 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The plaintiff may proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee. Summons will not issue at this time, however; the complaint is dismissed on initial review for failure to state a claim per 1915 (e)(2)(B). The complaint, as currently constructed, provides no factual basis upon which discrimination can be inferred. The dismissal is without prejudice, however, and the plaintiff may file for leave to amend the complaint within the next 30 days, by 12/15/19. The plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is also denied without prejudice for being incomplete. The plaintiff may refile a complete motion including information as to which attorneys/organizations he has contacted in order to seek representation, as well as why he has been unable to find an attorney. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 11/15/2019. Mailed notice (smm, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Oscar Lee Byles for attorney representation. (smm, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Oscar Lee Byles for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Oscar Lee Byles. (smm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Oscar Lee Byles; (Attachments). (smm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Byles v. Aramark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aramark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oscar Lee Byles | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
