Lang v. Lake County et al
| Emanuel Lang |
| Lake County, Armor Correctional Healthcare Inc., Alvaro Encinas and Nurse Esther |
| 1:2019cv07602 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Emanuel Lang. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of custody shall deduct $20.88 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund officer at the Lake County Jail and the Court's fiscal department. The Clerk shall: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint #1 on Nurse Esther, Armor Correctional Healthcare, and Lake County, and correct the docket to reflect that they are the only active Defendants; (3) forward the USM-285 service form for Lake County 5 to the Marshals Service; and (4) send Plaintiff two blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. Plaintiff must return completed USM-285 service forms for Nurse Esther and Armor to the Clerk in care of the Prisoner Correspondent by January 16, 2020. When completing the form for Nurse Esther, Plaintiff should provide as much identifying information as he can (for example, a last name, physical description, information about the shifts she normally works, etc.). If he fails to return the service forms, the Court may dismiss Nurse Esther and Armor, as well as dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. The Marshal is appointed to serve defendants and is authorized to send requests for waiver of service in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) before attempting personal service. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice as he appears to be able to complete the next steps in this case at this time. The court will revisit recruitment of counsel after Defendants respond to the complaint. Plaintiff must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is released or transferred to another facility. Failure to keep the Clerk advised of his correct address will subject this case to immediate dismissal. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 12/19/2019. Mailed notice(jh, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Armor Correctional Healthcare Inc., Nurse Esther, Lake County with a certified copy of Order dated 12/19/2019 to the U.S. Marshal Service via email. (jh, ) |
| MAILED Order dated 12/19/2019 to the Trust Fund Officer. (jh, ) |
| MAILED two blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of Order dated 12/19/2019 to the Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Emanuel Lang for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Emanuel Lang for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Emanuel Lang. (Exhibits) (Envelope not Postmarked) (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
