H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC v. Lurie Brothers, LLC et al
| H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC |
| Frank J. Cione, Lurie Brothers, LLC, John D. Dernis, Salvatore J. Cimino, Jr. and Alex D. Dernis |
| 1:2019cv07933 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. § 499 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Frank J. Cione(Golding, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Frank J. Cione by Jonathan David Golding (Golding, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Frank J. Cione by Richard N Golding (Golding, Richard) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC as to Lurie Brothers, LLC on 12/14/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. (Kohn, William) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC as to John D. Dernis on 12/14/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. (Kohn, William) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC as to Salvatore J. Cimino, Jr. on 12/14/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. (Kohn, William) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC as to Frank J. Cione on 12/13/2019, answer due 1/3/2020. (Kohn, William) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 4/29/2020 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) planning report re MIDP due 4/24/2020. The report must comply with the requirements of the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Salvatore J. Cimino, Jr., Frank J. Cione, Alex D. Dernis, John D. Dernis, Lurie Brothers, LLC (kl, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC by William Briskin Kohn as Local Counsel (Kohn, William) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC (Fassett, Mary) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC by Mary Jean Fassett (Fassett, Mary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fassett, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Enforce Payment from Produce Trust filed by H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., LLC; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16495861.(Fassett, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
