Pickett v. Pfister et al
Trolus Pickett |
Sherwin Miles, John Daley, Randy Pfister, Superintendent Tanner, Major Lake, Lieutenant Dunlap, Warden Barnes, Lieutenate Ahmad and Warden Walter Nicholson |
1:2019cv08071 |
December 10, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Gary Feinerman |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Plaintiff has paid the $400 filing fee 8 . The proposed complaint #1 is under consideration. The status hearing set for 1/29/2020 #5 is stricken and re-set for 3/11/2020 at 9:50 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 10 LETTER from Trolus Pickett dated 12/20/2019. (Envelope postmark illegible) (Document does not display case number) (bg, ) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT by Trolus Pickett. (Envelope Postmark date 12/7/19). (gcy, ) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Trolus Pickett (Envelope postmarked 12/21/2019) (bg, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Trolus Pickett for attorney representation. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Trolus Pickett for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Trolus Pickett. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.