Davis v. Hometown National Bank
Plaintiff: William S. Davis
Defendant: Hometown National Bank
Case Number: 1:2019cv08080
Filed: December 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2020 Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Joseph Scott Davidson for presentment of motion for leave to file #16 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/12/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Davidson, Joseph)
February 4, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff William S. Davis for leave to file First Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint)(Davidson, Joseph)
January 22, 2020 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Service by William P. Hintz on behalf of Hometown National Bank regarding answer to complaint #14 (Hintz, William)
January 22, 2020 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Hometown National Bank (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Insufficient Knowledge)(Hintz, William)
January 15, 2020 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time #8 #9 is granted. Defendant must respond to the complaint by 1/24/20. The motion hearing is stricken and no appearance is necessary. Status hearing before Judge Shah remains set for 2/19/20 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, )
January 13, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Correction re #10 (bg, )
January 10, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by William P. Hintz for presentment of motion to amend/correct,, motion for extension of time to file answer, #9 , motion for order #10 before Honorable Young B. Kim on 1/16/2020 at 11:00 AM. (Hintz, William)
January 10, 2020 Filing 10 PROPOSED order by Defendant Hometown National Bank for order (proposed order) (Hintz, William) (Docket text modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 1/13/2020 (bg, ).
January 10, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Hometown National Bank to amend/correct MOTION by Defendant Hometown National Bank for extension of time to file answer #8 , MOTION by Defendant Hometown National Bank for extension of time to file answer regarding extension of time #8 (Hintz, William)
January 7, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Hometown National Bank for extension of time to file answer (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Notice and Certificate of Service)(Hintz, William)
January 7, 2020 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hometown National Bank by William P. Hintz (Hintz, William)
December 27, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William S. Davis as to Hometown National Bank on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. (Davidson, Joseph)
December 18, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Hometown National Bank (ec, )
December 13, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 2/19/20 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, )
December 11, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, )
December 11, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, )
December 10, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff William S. Davis by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed)
December 10, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff William S. Davis by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph)
December 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William S. Davis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16518436. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Hometown National Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hometown National Bank
Represented By: William P. Hintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William S. Davis
Represented By: Mohammed Omar Badwan
Represented By: Joseph Scott Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?