Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund et al v. Kimco Facility Services, LLC
| LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund, Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust and Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund |
| Kimco Facility Services, LLC |
| 1:2019cv08151 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing held on 2/6/20. All discovery is stayed to allow the parties time to continue their settlement discussions. Status hearing set for 3/12/20 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE by Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund re status report #24 (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 24 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiffs Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund. (Jarka, Matthew) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiffs Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund. (Hensel, Sam) |
| Filing 21 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund (Hensel, Sam) |
| Filing 20 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 19 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Kimco Facility Services, LLC (Rhoten, Katie) |
| Filing 18 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Kimco Facility Services, LLC (Bassford Wilson, Susan) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint by Kimco Facility Services, LLC(Bassford Wilson, Susan) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion for extension of time until January 21, 2020 to answer #12 is granted. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Kimco Facility Services, LLC Defendant's Notice of Corporate and Affiliate Interests (Rhoten, Katie) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kimco Facility Services, LLC by Katie M Rhoten (Rhoten, Katie) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Unopposed Motion NOTICE of Motion by Susan E. Bassford Wilson for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/15/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Bassford Wilson, Susan) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Kimco Facility Services, LLC for extension of time to file answer Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint (Bassford Wilson, Susan) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kimco Facility Services, LLC by Susan E. Bassford Wilson (Bassford Wilson, Susan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Local 25 SEIU & Participating Employers Pension Trust, Local 25 SEIU Welfare Fund as to Kimco Facility Services, LLC on 12/17/2019, answer due 1/7/2020. (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 2/6/20 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Kimco Facility Services, LLC (kl, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund by Matthew Scott Jarka Corrected Appearance (Jarka, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund by Robert B. Greenberg Corrected Appearance (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund by Matthew Scott Jarka (Jarka, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund by Robert B. Greenberg (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund by Sam Hensel (Hensel, Sam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hensel, Sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by LOCAL 25 SEIU Welfare Fund & Participating Employers Pension Trust Fund; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16528887.(Hensel, Sam) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
