Scott v. Chevrolet of Homewood, Inc.
| Ronnie Scott |
| Chevrolet of Homewood, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv08177 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On the Court's own motion, initial status hearing set for 2/20/20 is stricken and reset to 2/21/20 at 9:00am. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Chevrolet of Homewood, Inc. by Bethany Naomi Schols (Schols, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Initial status hearing is set for 2/20/20 at 9:30 a.m. No later than five business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ronnie Scott by John Thomas Moran, Jr (Moran, John)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Moran, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Ronnie Scott; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16531212.(Moran, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Chevrolet of Homewood, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronnie Scott | |
| Represented By: | John Thomas Moran, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chevrolet of Homewood, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bethany Naomi Schols |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
