Artis v. Cook County Sheriff et al
| Richmond Artis |
| Kimberly Foxx, Illinois Department of Corrections employees John Does 1-5, Jason E Hoselton, Saron Siritoon, Thomas J. Dart, Ron Jeffreys, Anita Alvarez, Cook County Sheriff and Cook County Department of Corrections Employees John Does 1-5 |
| 1:2019cv08179 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Thomas J. Dart by Bianca B. Brown (Brown, Bianca) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Anita Alvarez, Cook County Department of Corrections Employees John Does 1-5, Cook County Sheriff, Thomas J. Dart, Kimberly Foxx, Jason E Hoselton, Illinois Department of Corrections employees John Does 1-5, Ron Jeffreys, Saron Siritoon. (ng, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER : Plaintiff is instructed to either: (1) file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or (b) pay the statutory $400 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not comply by February 14, 2020, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-incarcerated persons to Plaintiff, along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff is advised that he has a continuing obligation to keep the Court apprised of his current address, and failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. Additionally, the Clerk is instructed to change the Nature of Suit from a 440 (Civil Rights: Other) to a 555 (Prisoner Conditions). Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 1/15/2020. Mailed notice(mc, )
|
| MAILED Plaintiff a blank applicationto proceed in forma pauperis for non-incarcerated persons to Plaintiff, along with a copy of the order dated 1/15/2020 (mc, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mc, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (mc, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Richmond Artis (mc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 5 copies by Richmond Artis (mc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
