Blair v. The Dump
| Kiesha Blair |
| The Dump |
| 1:2019cv08202 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Dump with a certified copy of the Order dated 1/8/2020 to the U.S. Marshal Service via email. (jh, ) |
| Filing 11 COMPLAINT filed by Kiesha Blair. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff Kiesha Blair, pro se, seeks permission to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") and moves for attorney representation in this suit against her former employer, The Dump Furniture Outlet. Because plaintiff does not have sufficient assets to pay the filing fee, the IFP application #4 is granted. The Court instructs the Clerk to issue summons for service of the complaint on defendant, and appoints the United States Marshals Service to effect service. The Marshal is authorized to mail a request for waiver of service to the defendants in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2) before attempting personal service. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 1/8/2020. Mailed notice(jh, )
|
| Filing 9 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff Kiesha Blair. (jh, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| MAILED Standing Order and Checklist to Plaintiff, Kiesha Blair. (jh, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Kiesha Blair for attorney representation. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kiesha Blair for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Kiesha Blair. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Kiesha Blair. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blair v. The Dump | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kiesha Blair | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Dump | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
