Ranpak Corp. v. Sealed Air Corporation
Ranpak Corp. |
Sealed Air Corporation |
1:2019cv08206 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Martha M Pacold |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Sealed Air Corporation's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , Affirmative Defenses, and COUNTERCLAIM filed by Sealed Air Corporation against Ranpak Corp. . by Sealed Air Corporation(Bradley, Kirk) |
Filing 19 ORDER: Kirk T. Bradley's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Sealed Air Corporation #17 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/31/2020. Mailed notice(las, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's unopposed request to reset the status hearing is granted. The status hearing set for 2/20/2020 is stricken and reset to 3/3/2020 at 9:30 a.m. (rao, ) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16675949. (Bradley, Kirk) |
Filing 16 ORDER: Shawn P. Gannon's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Sealed Air Corporation #15 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/10/2020. Mailed notice(gcy, ) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16602952. (Gannon, Shawn) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ranpak Corp. by Kyle Bradford Fleming (Fleming, Kyle) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's unopposed motion for extension to respond to complaint #11 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 2/4/2020. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 2/14/2020. The Court will hold a status hearing on 2/20/2020 at 9:30 a.m. The motion hearing set for 1/7/2020 is stricken. (rao, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Robert Douglas Leighton for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/7/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Sealed Air Corporation for extension of time to Respond to Complaint (UNOPPOSED) (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Sealed Air Corporation by Robert Douglas Leighton (Leighton, Robert) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Sealed Air Corporation by A Colin Wexler (Wexler, A) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ranpak Corp. as to Sealed Air Corporation on 12/17/2019, answer due 1/7/2020. (Johnson, Mark) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ranpak Corp. by Alexander Isaac Ernst Passo (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ranpak Corp. by John L. Ambrogi (Ambrogi, John)(Case number missing from pdf) Modified on 12/18/2019 (las, ). |
Filing 5 MAILED Patent Report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (pj, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Sealed Air Corporation (txl, ) |
Filing 4 AO 120 Report of Filing Patent Case by Ranpak Corp. (Johnson, Mark) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ranpak Corp. (Johnson, Mark) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Johnson, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ranpak Corp.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16537396. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Pat No. 6,756,096)(Johnson, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.