Mitchell v. City of Chicago et al
Plaintiff: Diana Mitchell
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO, John Doe Officers and City of Chicago
Case Number: 1:2019cv08239
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2020 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #12 . Defendant's responsive pleading is due by 3/27/20. The Court strikes the status date set for 2/18/20 and resets it to 3/31/20 at 9:30 AM with the joint initial status report due by 3/24/20. Mailed notice (rj, )
February 4, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Raoul Vertick Mowatt for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/11/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Mowatt, Raoul)
February 4, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer (unopposed) (Mowatt, Raoul)
February 4, 2020 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Raoul Vertick Mowatt (Mowatt, Raoul)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: An audit was performed on cases filed that allege violation of civil rights by a prisoner or former prisoner. Based on this review, this matter is more properly designated as a Nature of Suit 550 (Prisoner: Civil Rights). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to change the Nature of Suit to 550. No further action is needed by the parties. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 1/6/2020. Mailed notice. (sxb, )
December 30, 2019 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Iris Chavira (Chavira, Iris)
December 29, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Diana Mitchell by Richard J. Dvorak (Dvorak, Richard)
December 23, 2019 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 2/18/2020 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 2/11/2020. Mailed notice (rj, )
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 12/19/2019:Mailed notice(rj, )
December 19, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Motion hearing held on 12/19/2019. Plaintiff's emergency motion for the entry of a preservation order #4 is granted. Mailed notice (rj, )
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Diana Mitchell for order FOR THE ENTRY OF A PRESERVATION ORDER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Motion)(Jones, Loren)
December 18, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, )
December 18, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City of Chicago. (ec, )
December 17, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Jones, Loren)
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Diana Mitchell; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16541853.(Jones, Loren)
December 17, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. City of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Represented By: Raoul Vertick Mowatt
Represented By: Iris Y. Chavira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Mitchell
Represented By: Loren V Jones
Represented By: Richard J. Dvorak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?